<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Technology, Theology, and Anything In Between</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.technotheologian.us/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.technotheologian.us</link>
	<description>This blog explores theology, technology, and (sometimes) the relation between the two.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 06:26:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Basic UNIX security on the Internet by Basic UNIX security on the Internet information</title>
		<link>http://www.technotheologian.us/2009/09/basic-unix-security-on-the-internet/comment-page-1/#comment-256</link>
		<dc:creator>Basic UNIX security on the Internet information</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 06:26:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.technotheologian.us/?p=151#comment-256</guid>
		<description>[...] View original post here:  Basic UNIX security on the Internet [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] View original post here:  Basic UNIX security on the Internet [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Thoughts on Debian Lenny by Thoughts on Debian Lenny &#124; Debian-News.net - Your one stop for news about Debian</title>
		<link>http://www.technotheologian.us/2009/05/thoughts-on-debian-lenny/comment-page-1/#comment-21</link>
		<dc:creator>Thoughts on Debian Lenny &#124; Debian-News.net - Your one stop for news about Debian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 11:14:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://216.121.120.178/?p=4#comment-21</guid>
		<description>[...] + TrueCrypt, and the system became unusable again. My solution is to install Debian Lenny. More here I&#8217;ve always appreciated Debian&#8217;s update system, and the package management. It is so [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] + TrueCrypt, and the system became unusable again. My solution is to install Debian Lenny. More here I&#8217;ve always appreciated Debian&#8217;s update system, and the package management. It is so [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on One year review of AT&amp;T U-Verse by DoubleM</title>
		<link>http://www.technotheologian.us/2009/01/one-year-review-of-att-u-verse/comment-page-1/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>DoubleM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2009 00:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://216.121.120.178/?p=8#comment-2</guid>
		<description>U-verse is excellent when properly installed and AT&T; says there will be more improvements. I like it very well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>U-verse is excellent when properly installed and AT&#038;T; says there will be more improvements. I like it very well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on BatteryRefill.com update by ben</title>
		<link>http://www.technotheologian.us/2008/09/batteryrefillcom-update/comment-page-1/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 04:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://216.121.120.178/?p=27#comment-3</guid>
		<description>Great for you. Your experience was a rare one. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;They had my battery for nearly two months. After promises of new cells were to arrive any day, they told me my battery was irreparable and would issue a refund.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;That was two weeks ago. No refund as of yet. After several phone calls, I have yet to get thru or to have my calls returned.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Just google &quot;batteryrefill.com&quot; to witness the sundry users they&#039;ve taken advantage of.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great for you. Your experience was a rare one. </p>
<p>They had my battery for nearly two months. After promises of new cells were to arrive any day, they told me my battery was irreparable and would issue a refund.</p>
<p>That was two weeks ago. No refund as of yet. After several phone calls, I have yet to get thru or to have my calls returned.</p>
<p>Just google &#8220;batteryrefill.com&#8221; to witness the sundry users they&#8217;ve taken advantage of.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Using a converged device at church by Tammy</title>
		<link>http://www.technotheologian.us/2007/03/using-a-converged-device-at-church/comment-page-1/#comment-14</link>
		<dc:creator>Tammy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 15:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://216.121.120.178/?p=65#comment-14</guid>
		<description>Keep up the good work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Keep up the good work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Dedicated Server for webhosting by Karen</title>
		<link>http://www.technotheologian.us/2008/06/dedicated-server-for-webhosting/comment-page-1/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>Karen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 09:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://216.121.120.178/?p=36#comment-4</guid>
		<description>Good to know, thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good to know, thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Dedicated Server for webhosting by Bob</title>
		<link>http://www.technotheologian.us/2008/06/dedicated-server-for-webhosting/comment-page-1/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 20:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://216.121.120.178/?p=36#comment-5</guid>
		<description>My refilled battery is working great!  I would still recommend refilling the battery, but knowing that there is a chance that it may not work.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;From what I understand about Lithium Ion battery cells, which is what most laptop batteries are made of, it is possible that keeping that battery out might prolong its life.  I&#039;ve heard that batteries should be stored at 40-60% of their full charge if you do this.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;However, Lithium Ion batteries also start to degrade right after they are manufactured.  So I&#039;m not sure that leaving the battery out will help much as far as prolonging the battery.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;There are many different opinions on batteries.  I would say that even if you get the batteries refilled, I would only expect the battery to last about 2 years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My refilled battery is working great!  I would still recommend refilling the battery, but knowing that there is a chance that it may not work.</p>
<p>From what I understand about Lithium Ion battery cells, which is what most laptop batteries are made of, it is possible that keeping that battery out might prolong its life.  I&#8217;ve heard that batteries should be stored at 40-60% of their full charge if you do this.</p>
<p>However, Lithium Ion batteries also start to degrade right after they are manufactured.  So I&#8217;m not sure that leaving the battery out will help much as far as prolonging the battery.</p>
<p>There are many different opinions on batteries.  I would say that even if you get the batteries refilled, I would only expect the battery to last about 2 years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Dedicated Server for webhosting by Karen</title>
		<link>http://www.technotheologian.us/2008/06/dedicated-server-for-webhosting/comment-page-1/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>Karen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 17:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://216.121.120.178/?p=36#comment-6</guid>
		<description>Just curious, how is your &#039;refilled&#039; battery working now that it&#039;s several months into its new life?  I&#039;ve got to replace mine now.  Also, my father-in-law read that if you are using your laptop primarily plugged in, you should keep your battery out most of the time.  Any truth to that?  I&#039;m finding lots of different opinions.  Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just curious, how is your &#8216;refilled&#8217; battery working now that it&#8217;s several months into its new life?  I&#8217;ve got to replace mine now.  Also, my father-in-law read that if you are using your laptop primarily plugged in, you should keep your battery out most of the time.  Any truth to that?  I&#8217;m finding lots of different opinions.  Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on U-verse and Amateur Radio by Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.technotheologian.us/2008/04/u-verse-and-amateur-radio/comment-page-1/#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 15:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://216.121.120.178/?p=39#comment-7</guid>
		<description>I just cancelled my AT&T; U-Verse and switched back to Time Warner cable on 6/9/2008.&lt;br /&gt;I am a ham radio operator and constantly had probelems with RF getting into the residential gateway.  &lt;br /&gt;i did not have interference problems with Time Warner before the switch to ATT U-verse and i do not have thme since i switched back to time warner.  &lt;br /&gt;The AT&T; U-verse equipemt appears to be operating in the frequency range that hams use know as HF.  this plus the fact that their equipment it not adequately filtered causes problems.  i had several techs out and we noticed that when RF got into the the gateway, error counts would go into the millions.  what is strange is that the error counts kept going up by the millions even when all ham radio equipment was turned off.  their concept is interesting, but the design is flawed.  we tried all the usual things that hams do to minmuze this interference like grounding everything, applying boat loads of ferrite beads on everything, but in the end the design flaw was too much to overcome.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just cancelled my AT&#038;T; U-Verse and switched back to Time Warner cable on 6/9/2008.<br />I am a ham radio operator and constantly had probelems with RF getting into the residential gateway.  <br />i did not have interference problems with Time Warner before the switch to ATT U-verse and i do not have thme since i switched back to time warner.  <br />The AT&#038;T; U-verse equipemt appears to be operating in the frequency range that hams use know as HF.  this plus the fact that their equipment it not adequately filtered causes problems.  i had several techs out and we noticed that when RF got into the the gateway, error counts would go into the millions.  what is strange is that the error counts kept going up by the millions even when all ham radio equipment was turned off.  their concept is interesting, but the design is flawed.  we tried all the usual things that hams do to minmuze this interference like grounding everything, applying boat loads of ferrite beads on everything, but in the end the design flaw was too much to overcome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on HSDPA update by Richard Bejtlich</title>
		<link>http://www.technotheologian.us/2007/11/hsdpa-update/comment-page-1/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Bejtlich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2008 16:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://216.121.120.178/?p=46#comment-9</guid>
		<description>Hello,&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Have you tried the card with FreeBSD?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello,</p>
<p>Have you tried the card with FreeBSD?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->